Tattersall v Dormakaba Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] ACTSC 28 - Travis Schultz & Partners

Keywords: Civil law, Costs, costs apportioned in line with liability for principal judgment up to date of first defendant’s offer of compromise, first defendant’s offer of compromise to third and fourth defendants eminently reasonable, offer failed to set out terms of orders proposed, offer not an offer of compromise within the meaning of r 1002, offer not capable of acceptance by one defendant on behalf of others, Plaintiff purported to make offer of compromise pursuant to Pt 2.10 of the Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT), third and fourth defendant to pay plaintiff’s and first defendant’s costs from date after first defendant’s offer of compromise., whether plaintiff's offer was instead a Calderbank offer

This content is restricted to site members (it's free to register). If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.

Andrew Evans
Lawyer
View Bio >

Interesting article? Share it around.